Sudharsan's 61, Sundar's 50, Rabada's Powerplay — GT Bowl SRH Out for 86 and Go Top of the Table
Pat Cummins won the toss, chose to bowl, and for an hour it looked like the right call. Then Gujarat Titans batted to 168, Kagiso Rabada and Jason Holder hit the strip with the new ball, and a Sunrisers batting order that had chased 249 three weeks ago was bowled out for 86 in 14.5 overs. Eighty-two runs. GT's biggest IPL win by a margin. Five in a row. Top of the table.
There are matches where the pitch tells you the story and matches where the bowlers do. Tuesday night at the Narendra Modi Stadium was the latter. Gujarat Titans 168 for 5 was not a forbidding total — on a true T20 surface, in front of a familiar crowd, against a batting line-up that has chased 249 at the Wankhede this season, it should have been a number Sunrisers Hyderabad worked their way past. Instead, the chase ended at 86 all out in 14.5 overs. The margin — 82 runs — is the largest by which Gujarat Titans have ever won an IPL match, eclipsing the 77-run win over Rajasthan three days earlier.
Two wins by record-breaking margins in four nights is the kind of run that stops being coincidence and starts being identity. Five consecutive wins — for only the second time in GT's IPL history. A jump to the top of the points table. And, most strikingly, a way of winning that has nothing to do with batting fireworks and everything to do with conditions, discipline, and bowlers who know precisely what this surface offers them. Kagiso Rabada's 3 for 28 and Jason Holder's 3 for 20 did not just dismantle SRH — they removed every assumption SRH had carried into the evening about what a powerplay at this ground is supposed to look like.
Match Summary
| GT Score | 168/5 (20 overs) |
| SRH Score | 86 all out (14.5 overs) |
| Result | Gujarat Titans won by 82 runs |
| Player of the Match | Kagiso Rabada (GT) — 3/28 in 4 overs |
| Toss | Sunrisers Hyderabad won, elected to field first |
| Venue | Narendra Modi Stadium, Ahmedabad |
How GT Won It — A Patient 168, Then a Devastating Powerplay
It is worth saying clearly: Gujarat Titans' batting innings did not feel like the foundation for a record-breaking result. After Cummins inserted GT on a surface that looked slightly slower than expected, Shubman Gill fell early for 5 off 7 — caught behind off the SRH captain — and Jos Buttler followed for 7 off 11, beaten by a back-of-a-length delivery that did not allow him the room he needed. By the end of the powerplay GT were still rebuilding rather than asserting, and a target somewhere around 150 looked the realistic upper limit.
What pulled the innings out of that drift was the partnership in the middle. Sai Sudharsan made 61 off 44 — five fours, two sixes, the kind of paced T20 innings that should be put in a coaching manual for batters playing on slower decks. Around him, Nishant Sindhu's 22 off 14 provided the brief acceleration in the middle, and then Washington Sundar walked in and did what Washington Sundar has now made habit at this venue — a controlled, almost classical 50 off 33, seven fours and a six, the lower-order innings that turns a competitive total into a defendable one. Praful Hinge and Sakib Hussain each took two wickets for SRH, but it was Cummins' 4-0-20-1 that kept the ceiling on. 168 was par. On a fresh deck, with the new ball still hard, it might have been par-minus.
Then Rabada and Mohammed Siraj walked out. And the evening became something else entirely. The opening over from Siraj set the temperature — three dot balls, a Travis Head edge that fell short of slip, then the breakthrough as Head holed out for 0 off 4. Rabada took the new ball from the other end and bowled the kind of powerplay spell that does not need a wicket on every ball to communicate menace. Abhishek Sharma was clean bowled for 6 off 4 after one boundary swing too many. Ishan Kishan went attempting to break free — 11 off 7. By the time SRH had completed six overs, they were five down and the chase had gone from difficult to fanciful. Holder bowled an eight-over spell across two bursts and finished with 3 for 20. Prasidh Krishna grabbed 2 for 23 in the middle. Siraj's 1 for 11 in three overs was the most economical opening spell of GT's season. Rashid Khan got the very last wicket — Eshan Malinga playing across — to complete a finish so emphatic that the closing celebrations felt almost subdued, the contest having long since stopped being one.
Where SRH Lost It — A Powerplay Wreck, and a Middle Order Asked Too Much
Pat Cummins' decision to bowl first was a defensible one — every visiting captain at this ground in 2026 has done the same calculus, and the dew forecast, while not extreme, leaned slightly in the direction of teams chasing. The miscalculation was not in the toss. It was in the assumption that a 168 chase against this bowling attack on this surface would unfold the way 240-plus chases at the Wankhede have unfolded for Sunrisers all season. Different stadium, different surface, different question.
The collapse was not gradual — it was instantaneous. Three wickets fell inside three overs. Travis Head walked back without a run, Abhishek Sharma followed for six, and once Ishan Kishan went chasing width, the Sunrisers' entire batting philosophy — predicated on left-hand power that targets the in-field — had been removed before the field restrictions had ended. Heinrich Klaasen's 14 off 16 was the version of his innings nobody has wanted to see — a man caught between attempting to rebuild and looking for tempo, finding neither. Cummins himself, batting at eight, struck two sixes and a four in his 19 off 9, but by then the captain's runs were the kind that decorate a scorecard rather than save a match. SRH have batting depth. What they did not have was a batter capable of doing what Sundar did at the other end — building when conditions demanded patience.
Some of this will be put down to a bad night, and some of it should be. But the pattern is also worth flagging: SRH have now twice this season been bowled out for under 100 (the KKR spin collapse, and now this). Both occasions came against attacks that hit a hard length at pace and asked the middle order to play against the movement rather than over the top. This is not a problem of personnel — Klaasen, Head, Abhishek and Kishan are all elite — but of method. On a surface where the easy boundary is not on offer, this batting line-up does not have a Plan B that involves digging in for 30 balls. That is the question Sunrisers must answer before the playoffs, because the surfaces they will face there will not always be Hyderabad.
Pitch and Conditions — A Surface That Behaved Exactly as Advertised
The Narendra Modi Stadium pitch played as the venue has played all season — a touch slow through the powerplay, holding marginally for the seamers who hit the deck hard, with the boundaries at 75 metres demanding timing rather than rewarding power. The bounce was honest, the carry through to the keeper was good for both sides' fast bowlers, and the dew that did arrive in the second innings was not heavy enough to give SRH's spinners any reprieve — though by then the chase had already been buried in the powerplay.
The single most telling number from the night is this: eight of SRH's ten wickets fell to pace. That mirrors precisely the venue's season-long average of 82% pace wickets, and tells you exactly why GT, who built their bowling attack around four genuine seam options, came into this evening as the structurally better-suited side. The surface did not collapse for batting — Sudharsan, Sundar and Cummins all proved that runs were available — but it demanded that batters chose the right ball to attack and resisted the wrong ones. Sunrisers, on the night, did neither.
Rabada's Spell — Four Overs of Why GT Bought Him
The Player of the Match award went to Kagiso Rabada, and on a night when Jason Holder took the same number of wickets for fewer runs, there was a small case to be argued about which of the two opening fast bowlers had been most decisive. The case settles around the powerplay. Rabada's 3 for 28 were not spread across his four overs as comfortable scalps — they were the wickets of Abhishek, Klaasen and Salil Arora, three of the four most dangerous SRH batters in this XI, and all three came inside the period of the innings where any chase has to find its rhythm.
The Abhishek dismissal — bowled, middle stump, after the left-hander had backed away looking for room on the leg side — was Rabada at his most precise: short of a length, full pace, the line and the bounce making the room Abhishek wanted disappear before the bat had completed its swing. The Klaasen wicket was the one that broke SRH's spine. Klaasen has spent this entire IPL season finding his tempo against pace, and Rabada simply did not let him — short, hard, into the body, the kind of bowling that asks even a power hitter to think twice before committing weight forward. The wicket itself was a glove behind down the leg side, a small mercy for the South African finisher; the spell that produced it was anything but. Rabada is paid the kind of money he is paid because he wins matches in patches like these. Tuesday was the patch.
Our Preview Review — Honest Marking
Our pre-match write-up leaned Gujarat Titans, on the back of conditions that fit their bowling attack and a venue that takes 82% of its wickets to pace. That call held up — and held up by a margin we did not anticipate. We flagged Jason Holder as the GT player to watch on his home ground; he produced 3 for 20, his third consecutive match of decisive impact, and made our call look more conservative than bold. We also wrote that the Rashid Khan-versus-Klaasen middle-overs duel could define the contest. It did not — because Klaasen never reached the middle overs in any meaningful sense, and Rashid only had to bowl five legitimate balls for one wicket to finish the chase. The framework was right, the casting was different from what we expected.
What we missed: Kagiso Rabada. We mentioned him in the GT preview but cast him as the express-pace foil rather than the headline act. He was, by night's end, the Player of the Match, and his powerplay spell was the single most decisive period of cricket in the contest. We will own that under-call. We also under-rated how comprehensively SRH's batting method could be broken by conditions — we said adaptability was the question, but we framed it as a degree of difficulty rather than an existential one. On a night when Travis Head fell first ball of consequence and the top order folded for under 30 runs in five overs, the answer to that question was sharper than we predicted. Lessons for the playoffs.
What Happens Next
For Gujarat Titans, five wins in a row and top of the table changes nothing about their daily routine and everything about how the rest of the league sees them. The playoff place is, in practical terms, secured. The remaining matches now become an audition for the top two — and a chance to back up the table position with the kind of all-conditions performances that travel into the knock-out stage. Sai Sudharsan, Washington Sundar and the Rabada-Holder-Siraj triumvirate are operating at a level that very few squads can match. KKR on May 16 is the next assignment, with Eden Gardens offering a contrast in surface and crowd that will test whether this Gujarat side is genuinely complete or merely Ahmedabad-perfect.
For Sunrisers Hyderabad, the post-match conversation will be less about the loss and more about the method. Seven wins from twelve still keeps them firmly in the playoff race, but tonight's pattern — top-order collapse against pace, middle order unable to repair — is the second time it has happened in three weeks. The selection question around Brydon Carse in place of an extra batter, the role of Heinrich Klaasen on slower surfaces, the dependence on Head and Abhishek for the powerplay platform — all of it will be raised again before the next fixture. SRH will not panic. But they will need to find a Plan B in two weeks that they have not yet displayed in twelve.
Want data-backed predictions for every IPL 2026 match?