CricIntel
County ChampionshipCounty Championship 2026LeicestershireNews

A film shoot, a 'horrendous' pitch, no lawyers: how Leicestershire relegated themselves

Leicestershire won the match by 42 runs and still went down. The appeal panel didn't blame the Bollywood shoot. It blamed the club for gambling on getting a second hearing.

November 5, 2026|4 min read|CricIntel Editorial

Won the game, lost the division

Leicestershire beat Glamorgan by 42 runs at Grace Road in August. That win is now the reason they are a Division Two side.

The Cricket Discipline Panel (CDP) has dismissed the club's appeal against a 19-point deduction for a pitch rated "poor". The decision came on Wednesday, more than five weeks after the County Championship season ended. Leicestershire finish ninth, 17 points behind Essex, and are relegated with Hampshire. Essex stay up. Durham and Kent come up.

The numbers are simple. The penalty was 19 points and the gap is 17. If Leicestershire had kept the points from that win, they would have stayed up by two.


The club is the author of its own misfortune.
Richard Whittam KC, chair of the Cricket Discipline Panel

The panel's real complaint: the club gambled

Ruling against a pitch is routine. What stands out here is how strongly the panel criticised the way Leicestershire handled the case.

Whittam said the club showed "a woeful lack of understanding" of the regulatory process. He said it made "a conscious decision" not to instruct lawyers or ask for an adjournment at the first hearing, and called that "a serious error of judgement". In his reading, Leicestershire "gambled" that they could "have another go" on appeal. They did bring in lawyers for the appeal, which ran across two hearings last month. By then the first ruling was the one they had to overturn.

They argued three grounds: that no reasonable body could have reached the original decision, that the fast-tracked timetable was a significant procedural irregularity, and that significant new evidence had come to light. All three were rejected.


The Grace Road case in numbers

Match Leicestershire bt Glamorgan by 42 runs, Aug 20โ€“23
Variable-bounce instances logged 37 (match referee Ian Ramage)
Original penalty 27 points (8 later reinstated)
Final penalty 19 points (16 for the win + 3 bonus)
Gap to safety (Essex, 8th) 17 points
Pitch left uncovered (groundsman's account) 13 hours; film event overran by 5
Seasons in Division One 1, their first since 2003

The Bollywood defence

Leicestershire's main explanation was a Bollywood film crew. The club let a film production use Grace Road a few days before the Glamorgan game. Head groundsman Callum Lewin told the appeal the event overran by five hours, which he called "horrendous". He said the producer would not let the pitch be covered, so it sat exposed for 13 hours. The club's own figure was eight hours uncovered in heatwave temperatures. Earlier reports linked the shoot to a Sourav Ganguly biopic. The filmmakers have said the shoot was properly authorised.

The panel agreed the shoot played a part, but it did not accept it as an excuse. It backed the view of Andy Mackay, the ECB's pitch and grounds advisor, that the shoot was not the only cause of the problems. The panel's main point was that Leicestershire chose to hire the ground out.


Any competent person would have insisted on the need for a protective mat as a condition of hire.
Cricket Discipline Panel judgement, backing ECB pitch advisor Andy Mackay

Even their own coach couldn't defend the surface

The worst evidence for Leicestershire was not about who was to blame for the pitch. It was how bad the pitch was. Several batters were hit on the body. Umpires Ben Debenham and Mike Burns said abandoning the match had been discussed and was "a close call". Glamorgan captain Kiran Carlson said he had been close to walking his players off.

Then there was Richard Dawson, Leicestershire's coach at the time, who has since joined England's Test set-up. He said he had never seen a worse pitch in 30 years in professional cricket. When the home coach says that, the appeal is in serious trouble.

The new evidence was a witness statement from Tony Hemming, a former PCB curator. Whittam said it was "highly unlikely" to have changed the outcome.


We firmly believe this evidence would have made a significant difference to the outcome, and it is deeply frustrating that it could not be heard. From the outset, the club felt rushed and under considerable pressure throughout this process.
Emma White, Leicestershire chief executive

The verdict: Leicestershire have a point, but not in this case

White does raise a fair point about the system. She is asking for "greater clarity and consistency" in how pitches are inspected and rated. A season that ends with relegation decided by a tribunal five weeks later is a bad look for the Championship. The rules made things harsher too: a new 2026 playing condition says a substandard pitch automatically costs a team every point it earned in that match. The CDP even admitted it had overlooked that rule the first time.

But this was the wrong case to make that argument with. The pitch was bad enough that abandonment was "a close call". The club rented the square to a film crew without insisting on a protective mat. Then it went to the first hearing without lawyers and hoped to win on appeal. That is three mistakes, and every one of them was Leicestershire's own.

It is a painful way to go down. This was their first top-flight season in 23 years, and the same club finished runners-up in the One Day Cup. White says the club "will not allow this to define us". For next season, the first thing they can fix is simple: put a mat on the square when they hire it out.

Want data-backed predictions for every IPL 2026 match?