CricIntel
Match ReviewThe Hundred 2026London SpiritNews

Super Giants Hold Their Nerve at Lord's: Seifert's 67 Just Outlasts a Livingstone Special as Manchester Win by 7

The Hundred returned to Lord's wearing new colours — IPL ownership, an MSG badge, a competition remade in franchise cricket's image — and produced an old-fashioned thriller. Tim Seifert's 67 off 45 gave Manchester Super Giants 138 for 9, and it needed every run. Liam Livingstone answered with 69 off 40, five sixes and a captain's fury, and dragged London Spirit to the brink before the bowling of Atkinson and Baker held the line. Super Giants won by 7. Livingstone lost, brilliantly.

July 23, 2026|5 min read|CricIntel Staff

Lord's has hosted a great deal in its long life, and on Thursday it hosted the future — a Manchester Super Giants side, an IPL owner's badge on the shirt, The Hundred reborn as franchise cricket's newest colony. There has been plenty of hand-wringing about what English cricket sold to get here. There was rather less hand-wringing during the ninety minutes when Tim Seifert and Liam Livingstone reminded everyone why the format sells at all.

Manchester Super Giants won by seven runs, and the scoreline is honest: this was a close game decided in the last handful of deliveries, the kind of finish that a competition built for exactly this outcome will happily take. Seifert's 67 was the innings that set it up. Livingstone's 69 was the innings that almost tore it down. In the end the difference was margins — a few dot balls here, a mistimed heave there — and the team with the settled bowling attack found them first.


Match Summary — Men's

Manchester Super Giants138/9 (100 balls)
London Spirit131/6 (100 balls)
ResultManchester Super Giants won by 7 runs
Match's defining inningsTim Seifert — 67 (45)
MSG top scorersTim Seifert 67 (45), Heinrich Klaasen 17 (11), Jos Buttler 16 (11)
London Spirit top scorersLiam Livingstone 69 (40, 5 sixes), Dewald Brevis 22 (23), Kiran Carlson 19 (19)
Spirit bowlingAdam Zampa 2/27, Liam Livingstone 2/14
MSG bowlingSonny Baker 2/29, Josh Tongue 1/26, Liam Dawson 1/23
VenueLord's, London

Manchester's 138 for 9 was, on the face of it, an underwhelming return from a batting card featuring Buttler, Klaasen and Markram. It was Seifert who saved it from being a genuine failure. The New Zealander's 67 off 45 was a masterclass in reading a slowish surface — six fours, three sixes, and a willingness to take the aerial route only when the field and the length allowed it. Around him, the big names came and went: Klaasen's 17 and Buttler's 16 were bright cameos rather than the substantial innings the total needed. Without Seifert, this is 110 and a non-contest. With him, it was just enough — and 'just enough' is a genre Manchester will happily bank on night one.

Spirit's bowling deserves credit for keeping it there. Adam Zampa's leg-spin was the control bowler, choking the middle overs for two for 27, and Livingstone himself chipped in with a canny two for 14. That London restricted a top-heavy MSG order to 138 was itself a small victory — the problem was that their own batting, Livingstone aside, could not quite match it.


Which brings us to the innings everyone will remember. Liam Livingstone captained London Spirit and clearly took the chase personally — 69 off 40 with five sixes, a display of clean, contemptuous hitting that at times made 139 look like a formality. He is one of the few batters in the world who can shift a required rate by two runs an over in the space of a single over, and for a stretch on Thursday he looked ready to win it on his own. The trouble, as the Yahoo Sports headline neatly put it, was the support: Dewald Brevis's 22 and Kiran Carlson's 19 were starts, not stands, and when Livingstone's assault finally paused, the Spirit lower order was left needing too much from too little. The captain doing everything, and it still not being enough, is one of T20's oldest and saddest stories.


The margins in the field told the tale, and Manchester's bowling found them. Sonny Baker's two for 29 was the spell that mattered most, removing the batters who might have partnered Livingstone and forcing the captain to keep gambling from one end. Josh Tongue and Liam Dawson each grabbed a wicket to keep the screws turning, and MSG's attack was deep enough that when Livingstone's assault paused, there was always another bowler to squeeze the over Spirit could not afford to waste. That balance — a wicket-taker for every moment the game threatened to slip — is what got them home by seven. There is a delicious footnote on the other side: Livingstone's own two for 14 with the ball had helped keep MSG to 138 in the first place, which only sharpens the cruelty of falling seven short of it.


The Lord's pitch was on the slower side, a surface that punished the lofted shot played without certainty and rewarded timing over muscle — which is precisely why Seifert and Livingstone, the two cleanest strikers on show, stood out from the pack. It was not a belter. In a competition often accused of manufacturing carnage, a 138-plays-131 arm-wrestle at the home of cricket was, if anything, a reassuringly proper game.


The Women's Match — Super Giants Sweep the Double


Manchester made it a clean sweep of the Lord's double-header. In the women's fixture, London Spirit were bowled out for just 80 — Ryana MacDonald-Gay ripping through the top order with four for 17 and Sophie Ecclestone chipping in with one for 7 from her allocation — and Manchester Super Giants knocked off the runs for the loss of three wickets, reaching 86 for 3 with 41 balls to spare. A seven-wicket win to match the men's seven-run one; a good night to be wearing the Super Giants badge.


This match did not carry a dedicated CricIntel preview. What it offered instead was the clearest possible rebuttal to the idea that the rebranded, IPL-owned Hundred would be all spectacle and no substance. Seifert against Livingstone, decided by seven runs at Lord's, was cricket — proper, tense, and beautifully played. English cricket may have sold its soul to get to this point, as we have argued elsewhere. On this evidence, at least the product on the field is still worth watching.

Want data-backed predictions for every IPL 2026 match?