CricIntel
Australia CricketNathan LyonPat CumminsNews

They keep calling it a 'one-off' — but Lyon has now been dropped three times in 18 months

Australia axed their greatest spinner for the Gqeberha Test. Again, the selectors said it was about conditions. Again, Nathan Lyon disagreed. At 38, the pattern is becoming impossible to ignore.

October 20, 2026|5 min read|CricIntel Editorial

The GOAT sits out — again

Nathan Lyon has 570-plus Test wickets. He passed Glenn McGrath on the all-time list. He is the most prolific off-spinner in Test history outside the subcontinent. And for the third time in 18 months, Australia told him to put his feet up.

Pat Cummins confirmed at the toss in Gqeberha that Lyon was out of the XI for the second Test against South Africa. Scott Boland came in. Four seamers. No spinner. The pitch was green, the skies were grey, and the selectors saw conditions that screamed pace. Fair enough — until you notice this keeps happening.

It happened at the Gabba during the Ashes. It happened at Sabina Park in the West Indies. Now it's happened at St George's Park. Each time, Australia's selectors have reached for the same word: one-off. But three one-offs in 18 months is not a one-off. It's a trend.


It's partly conditions, and Scotty Boland has been incredible whenever he's played Test cricket.
Pat Cummins, at the toss in Gqeberha

The numbers tell a story selectors won't

Lyon has now missed five of Australia's last ten Tests. Some were injury. Some were selection. But the result is the same: Australia's greatest modern spinner is no longer an automatic pick. For a man who was an immovable fixture from 2013 to 2024 — he didn't miss a single red-ball Test when fit in that entire span — the shift is seismic.

The first crack appeared at the Gabba in the 2025-26 Ashes. Selector George Bailey called it a one-off. Lyon was, by his own admission, "absolutely filthy." Then came Sabina Park, where selector Tony Dodemaide described it as "exceptional circumstances" and said it was "no reflection on Nathan's performance." Now Cummins is using the same playbook in South Africa.

At some point, the pattern speaks louder than the press conferences.


Lyon's omission timeline

Gabba, Ashes 2025-26 Dropped for all-pace XI — Bailey: "a one-off"
Sabina Park, WI 2025 Dropped — Dodemaide: "exceptional circumstances"
Gqeberha, SA 2026 Dropped for Boland — Cummins: "conditions" and "Boland's been incredible"
Test career 143 Tests, 570+ wickets @ ~30
Age on Oct 20, 2026 38 — turns 39 next month

Boland makes the argument — but that's the problem

The uncomfortable truth for Lyon is that the all-pace gambit keeps working. Boland dismissed Aiden Markram and David Bedingham with consecutive deliveries on day one at Gqeberha. He took four for 31 in the first innings. Australia had South Africa 97 for 5 before rain intervened. The four-seamer attack did exactly what Cummins said it would.

And that's the trap. Every time Lyon gets dropped, his replacement performs. Every time his replacement performs, the case for dropping Lyon next time gets stronger. The selectors aren't punishing Lyon — they're being seduced by alternatives. Boland averages under 20 in Test cricket. When the pitch is green and the Dukes ball is hooping, the maths is brutal for a 38-year-old finger spinner.


Every Test match it is said 'four quicks'.
Nathan Lyon

The Crawley problem

There's one quote from the Ashes that should worry Lyon more than anything his own selectors have said. Zak Crawley, England's opener, admitted he found it easier to find his rhythm against Australia's all-pace attack when Lyon was absent. "No Nathan Lyon helped me find rhythm," Crawley said.

Think about what that means. Opponents are publicly saying they prefer facing Australia without their spinner. Lyon's threat isn't just about wickets — it's about the pressure he creates from one end while the quicks rotate from the other. Without that pressure, batting becomes more predictable. Australia might win individual Tests with four seamers, but the strategic cost over a series is something Cummins has yet to fully confront.


What happens in New Zealand?

The two-Test series against New Zealand follows this South Africa tour. The Kiwi pitches are traditionally seam-friendly. The Dukes ball will be in play. The cloud cover is reliable. If the selectors drop Lyon in South Africa because of green pitches and grey skies, the same logic applies in Christchurch and Wellington.

That's the question nobody in the Australian camp wants to answer. If Lyon keeps getting dropped every time conditions favour pace — and conditions outside the subcontinent almost always favour pace — then what exactly is his role? A specialist for turning pitches in India and Sri Lanka? A luxury pick when the sun is shining? That's not a role for the sixth-highest wicket-taker in Test history. That's a managed decline.


The CricIntel take

Nathan Lyon deserves better than euphemisms. "One-off." "Exceptional circumstances." "Conditions." These are the words of a selection panel that doesn't want to say what it's actually doing: phasing out its greatest spinner in real time, one green pitch at a time.

If Australia genuinely believe Lyon remains their first-choice spinner, they owe him the honesty of saying he'll play every Test where spin is a realistic option — and then defining where that line is. If they don't believe that, they owe him the honesty of a conversation about his future, not another press conference about conditions.

Lyon has earned 570-plus Test wickets. He hasn't earned the right to play forever — nobody does. But he has earned the right to be told the truth. And right now, the truth is this: Australia are building a post-Lyon future, whether they admit it or not.

Want data-backed predictions for every IPL 2026 match?