India Beat New Zealand by 4 Wickets — Samson Lights the Chase, Dhir Finishes It With Two Balls to Spare
New Zealand posted 225 for 4 at Hagley Oval, their highest T20I total against India, built on Glenn Phillips' unbeaten 82. India raced to 93 without loss in 35 balls, lost four for 29 to Bracewell and Santner, and were hauled home by Iyer, Axar and a 15-ball 42 not out from Naman Dhir. India lead the five-match series 1-0.
Five days after a run-soaked series against West Indies on Indian pitches, India landed in a different hemisphere, under different skies, and found themselves in exactly the same kind of game. New Zealand made 225 for 4 at Hagley Oval. India needed every one of their batters' instincts, a little help from the dew, and a top-edged six from Naman Dhir to get there with two balls left.
It was the kind of chase that tells you two things at once. That India's top order can make 226 look small in a quarter of an hour, and that a team can get itself into a muddle when the ball starts to turn. New Zealand 225 for 4 (20 overs). India 230 for 6 (19.4 overs). India won by four wickets and lead the five-match T20I series 1-0. Sanju Samson, with 67 from 33 balls, was Player of the Match.
Match Summary
| Match | 1st T20I, India tour of New Zealand 2026 |
| New Zealand | 225/4 (20 overs) |
| India | 230/6 (19.4 overs) |
| Result | India won by 4 wickets (with 2 balls remaining) |
| Toss | India won and elected to field |
| Player of the Match | Sanju Samson (IND) — 67 (33), 8x4, 4x6 |
| Venue | Hagley Oval, Christchurch |
| Date | October 22, 2026 |
| Series | India lead 1-0 in the 5-match series |
| Top performers — India | |
| Sanju Samson | 67 (33), 8x4, 4x6 |
| Naman Dhir | 42* (15), 5x4, 2x6 |
| Shreyas Iyer | 42 (28), 1x4, 2x6 |
| Abhishek Sharma | 29 (12), 2x4, 3x6 |
| Axar Patel | 24 (14), 3x4, 1x6; 4-0-51-1 |
| Mayank Yadav | 4-0-40-1 |
| Arshdeep Singh | 4-0-45-1 |
| Top performers — New Zealand | |
| Glenn Phillips | 82* (40), 8x4, 3x6 |
| Finn Allen | 45 (24), 5x4, 2x6 |
| Bevon Jacobs | 31 (16), 3x6 |
| Michael Bracewell | 4-0-37-2 |
| Mitchell Santner | 4-0-39-2 |
| Lockie Ferguson | 3-0-34-1 |
| Adam Milne | 3-0-43-1 |
| Powerplays | |
| New Zealand | 65/1 |
| India | 94/1 |
India: A Flying Start, a Wobble, and Depth Enough
For five overs India's chase was a blur. Samson and Abhishek Sharma put on 93 in 35 balls, and two of the first four overs went for more than 20, Lockie Ferguson and Adam Milne conceding a combined 48 from the third and fourth. Samson took most of the strike and reached his fifty from 23 balls in the sixth over. India's powerplay was 94 for 1; at that point the contest looked settled.
It wasn't. Abhishek made room to carve Bracewell and was caught at short third for 29 off 12, and India chose not to send in Ishan Kishan, their regular No. 3. Tilak Varma came instead and, as has been the story of his year against spin through the middle, could not get going: 6 from 11 before a miscued slog off Bracewell. Samson inside-edged Santner onto his stumps, and Kishan was caught at deep midwicket off Santner. From 93 without loss India were 122 for 4, four wickets gone for 29 in 22 balls.
What rescued them was depth. Axar Patel, promoted to No. 6 with Shivam Dube left out for Nitish Kumar Reddy, made 24 off 14 and added 45 from 24 balls with Shreyas Iyer. Both were dropped, Iyer the more straightforward chance, put down by Allen at long-on on 27. Iyer went on to 42 and added 43 with Dhir before falling to a Milne cutter in the 19th over, leaving 16 needed from 11. Dhir found the boundary every time the pressure built and finished it with a top-edged hook for six, two needed from three balls.
With the ball India were steadier than the final total suggests. Mayank Yadav's 141kph took Tim Seifert's edge, Axar had Allen skewing to long-off, and Arshdeep Singh, who finished with 1 for 45, also ran out Bevon Jacobs with a flick of his left boot into the stumps at the non-striker's end. Bhuvneshwar Kumar went wicketless for 49 but held the catch that ended Daryl Mitchell's 28.
New Zealand: A Record Total, a Chase They Couldn't Hold
New Zealand did most things right with the bat. Finn Allen, playing his first T20 in New Zealand since March 2025, struck 45 off 24, much of it hit straight back past seam and spin alike, and had his side 80 for 2 inside the eighth over. The innings then belonged to Glenn Phillips, who used his feet to Axar, pulled anything short and finished unbeaten on 82 from 40, his fifty coming from 27 balls. His 73-run stand in 33 balls with Jacobs, who hit his first ball for six, lifted New Zealand to 225 for 4, their highest T20I total against India.
The bowling told a different story. A new ball that swung, and occasionally seamed, proved hard to control; by the end of the fifth over New Zealand had bowled four wides and conceded 14 runs in extras. India's extras ran to 17 in all, against New Zealand's 8. The spinners brought them back, Bracewell and Santner sharing four wickets for 76 in eight overs, but the finish slipped away. Santner bowled two long-hops in the 17th, and Nathan Smith, Milne and Matt Henry all served up full tosses in the last three overs. Henry's 3.4 overs cost 57. Both sides were penalised for slow over rates and had to keep an extra fielder inside the circle for the final over of their bowling innings.
Pitch and Conditions
We weren't at the ground, so we go by the scorecard and ESPNcricinfo's report. The surface was a good one for batting: 455 runs were scored in 39.4 overs, and neither side was bowled out. The new ball swung extravagantly under the lights, which explains New Zealand's early wides as much as India's 94-run powerplay. Then the Canterbury night settled in, quietly, over the grass, and with it came the dew, which the report names as one of the things that caught up with New Zealand at the death. Wet balls make full tosses, and New Zealand bowled several. Anyone batting second at Hagley on Saturday night will know what to expect.
Player of the Match: Sanju Samson
Chasing 226, someone has to make the target feel smaller before the bowlers can settle, and Samson did it. He took the bulk of the strike in the 93-run opening stand, hit eight fours and four sixes, and reached fifty from 23 balls in the sixth over. When he fell for 67 from 33, inside-edging Santner onto his stumps in the ninth over, India were 115 for 2, needing 111 from 66 balls. The collapse that followed showed how much his start was worth. In a game with 455 runs, his was the innings that put India in a position they could afford to stumble from.
CricIntel Prediction Review
Our preview gave New Zealand the edge, on home conditions, a well-rested squad and familiarity with Hagley Oval. That call was wrong. We said Lockie Ferguson's pace and Matt Henry's swing could be decisive: Ferguson took 1 for 34 but was part of the expensive third and fourth overs, and Henry went wicketless for 57. Santner through the middle overs, which we also flagged, was right; he and Bracewell were the reason the game turned.
What we got right was the alternative case. We wrote that if India's top order took on the short boundaries early, their power could overwhelm New Zealand at the death, and that is close to what happened, Dhir's 42 not out off 15 finishing the job. Iyer, whom we described as being in the form of his life, made 42. Arshdeep and Mayank Yadav, our two pace picks for India, took a wicket each.
One correction we owe readers: the SEO description on our match page listed Suryakumar Yadav and Trent Boult, neither of whom is in this series. The preview article itself correctly reported both as absent.
What to Watch: 2nd T20I, October 24
The teams stay at Hagley Oval for the 2nd T20I on Saturday, October 24, with India 1-0 up in the five-match series. India's batting order is the first question: Tilak at No. 3 against spin did not work on Thursday, and how they use Kishan will say a lot. For New Zealand, it is the new ball and the death overs. They made the runs; they need to keep the ball dry and full in the right places. Phillips, unbeaten and in command, and Dhir, who finished it, are the two to watch.
Want data-backed predictions for every IPL 2026 match?